Thursday, July 24, 2014

Atheists Sue Michigan Mayor Who Barred Their Booth

City Hall in the Detroit suburb of Warren, Michigan has included a "prayer station" for years, but when Douglas Marshall, the local member of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, asked to erect an adjacent atheist "reason station," Mayor Jim Fouts said that he wouldn't allow the atheists to denigrate prayer any more than he would allow the Nazis or Ku Klux Klan to do so.
“Everybody is welcome, but nobody is welcome who is out to disparage another group. . . . [It's] another continuing saga by a group of people who, in my opinion, promote conflict rather than resolution and understanding.”
-- Mayor Jim Fouts
For background, read of the myriad atheist lawsuits against Christians and prayer nationwide.

Click headlines below to read previous articles:


Atheists Attack Christian Kids Club in Portland, Oregon

FDR's D-Day Prayer is Un-American, Say Atheists

President Obama Provokes Second 'In God We Trust' Movement

Atheists, secular humanists, totalitarians etc. feel they are "on the ropes" after a recent series of Supreme Court rulings favoring religious liberty, reinvigorating Christian citizenship.

In addition, read Atheists Told, Army Will Support Day of Prayer and also read Sheriff Defies ACLU: July 4th Prayer in Louisiana as well as Texas Mayor Declares 2014 as the 'Year of the Bible'

-- From "Rejected atheist booth in Mich. city hall draws lawsuit" by Alix Watson, Associated Press 7/24/14

The city doesn’t endorse the “prayer station,” but has allowed religious groups to set up tables in the atrium for several years, according to Fouts.

“They don’t walk up to people,” Fouts said. “They are just there if someone wishes to seek solace or guidance from them. The atheist station does not serve that purpose. It will not contribute to community values or helping an individual out.”

In December 2011, Warren prohibited the Madison, Wisconsin-based Freedom from Religion Foundation from displaying an anti-religion sign next to a nativity scene at City Hall. A federal judge later ruled Fouts had authority to bar the poster because he felt it was antagonistic and would cause hostility.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "Warren atheist sues to set up alternative to prayer station at city hall" by Christina Hall, Detroit Free Press Staff Writer 7/23/14


The lawsuit against Fouts and the city was filed in U.S. District Court by the American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for Separation of Church and State and Freedom From Religion Foundation on behalf of Marshall.

In his [denial] letter, Fouts said Freedom From Religion is not a religion, has no tenets and no congregation.

“To my way of thinking, your group is strictly an anti-religion group intending to deprive all organized religions of their constitutional freedoms or at least discourage the practice of religion. The City of Warren cannot allow this,” he wrote, underlining the last sentence.

The proposed sign [by Marshall] would have read: “There are no gods, no devils, no angels, No heaven or hell. There is only our natural world. Religion is but Myth and superstition that hardens hearts and enslaves minds.”

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

Also read New Mexico Museum Seeks Atheists, Slams Christians

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Abortionists' $Millions to Buy Texas Governorship

As the majority of all abortion clinics close in Texas because of recent pro-life legislation, Planned Parenthood has made a business decision to invest at least $3 million in an effort to purchase the governorship for Democrat candidate Wendy Davis who has promised to increase business for the abortion industry in order to meet budgeted quotas.
“While the murder of any unborn child is appalling, even more criminal is the establishment of a target to kill over 1,100 innocent Texas children in order to meet financial targets.”
-- Congressman Bill Flores (R-TX)
For background, read about Wendy Davis and the Texas legislative battle over abortion restrictions.

Also click headlines below to read previous articles:


Abortion Clinic Closings Set Record; Admit Defeat

Over One-third of Abortion Clinics in Ohio Close

Texas Yanks Abortionist's License for 268 Killed


-- From "Planned Parenthood plans $3 million Texas campaign" by The Associated Press 7/20/14

The political arm of Planned Parenthood expects to spend $3 million to support Texas Democrats in the 2014 general election, a move that has raised concerns from anti-abortion activists about whether they can match that sort of money in a fight to attract women voters.

Cecile Richards, president of the national advocacy group Planned Parenthood Votes, said the effort aims to draw differences between Democrat Wendy Davis and Republican Greg Abbott, the state attorney general, in the campaign for governor.

Planned Parenthood organizers said they want an aggressive field program to reach more than 300,000 women through phone banks, door-to-door visits, direct mail, social media and radio and online advertising.

Planned Parenthood’s push is similar to its efforts in other states. The group spent nearly $2.5 million in the 2013 Virginia governor’s race, helping a Democrat unseat a Republican, and plans to spend $3 million in a North Carolina U.S. Senate race.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "Planned Parenthood aiming to spend $3 million on Texas elections in 2014" by Peggy Fikac and David Saleh Rauf, Houston Chronicle 7/19/14

The new PAC, called Planned Parenthood Texas Votes, is intended to bolster the top of the Democratic ticket, along with a slate of state House candidates and the Democrat running for Davis' open Senate seat. The group also endorsed Rep. Sarah Davis, the only Republican who voted against last year's tighter abortion restrictions.

Created just four months ago, the PAC already has more than $1 million cash on hand, mostly through the $1 million donation from Planned Parenthood Chair Cecilia Boone. It's only the third contribution of that amount recorded by any candidate or PAC this election cycle.

The endeavor will be coordinated with a new Texas-based Planned Parenthood 501c4 group, a tax exempt nonprofit that does not have to disclose contributors.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "Planned Parenthood Has Abortion Quotas, Says Former Clinic Director" by Tristyn Bloom, Daily Caller 7/22/14

Former Planned Parenthood clinic director Abby Johnson says she has proof that a Texas Planned Parenthood clinic had abortion quotas — target numbers of abortions it needed to perform in order to meet its budget.

Johnson, who left the Planned Parenthood clinic in Bryan, Texas in 2010, released a budget statement for the 2010 fiscal year she said shows that the clinic was expected to perform at least 1,135 abortions that year . . . [and] needed to make at least $313.29 per abortion performed.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "Planned Parenthood Confirms it Gave Clinic Award for Killing More Babies in Abortions" by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com 7/18/14


“So remember when I posted this photo that we received from a former Planned Parenthood worker? And remember that we said that this was an award for increasing their abortion numbers at the Aurora abortion clinic?” [Abby Johnson] wrote. “Well, Planned Parenthood has responded and has confirmed that, YES, this is an award that was given out by them. And, YES, they will continue to “celebrate their progress and they always will.”

At the Planned Parenthood affiliate web page, the abortion business says:
Political groups with an extreme agenda took to social media this week to claim they’ve found proof that Planned Parenthood has “quotas” for how many abortions the organization should provide. . . . yes, we absolutely do celebrate our progress in ensuring that more people have access to the full range of reproductive health care, including abortion. And we always will.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

Also read Planned Parenthood President Asks, Who Cares When Life Begins?

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Court Rules NO 'Gay Marriage' Obligation on States

Although many European nations have blazed the trail for "gay rights," of the 47 nations that comprise the Council of Europe, only eleven recognize same-sex "marriage," and a recent ruling by the European Court of Human Rights has struck a new blow to advancement of the Gay Agenda.

For background, read 'Gay Marriage' Flops in Expanding European Union

Also read Russia Outlaws Homosexual Propaganda, Kissing as well as Supreme Court Rules Homosexual Behavior Illegal in India

-- From "European court strikes down transgender marriage case" by Nikolaj Nielsen, EU Observer 7/16/14

A Finnish citizen who wanted the state to recognise her new gender after surgery and remain legally married to woman at the same time lost her case at the Strasbourg-based European Court of Human Rights on Wednesday (16 July).

Heil Hamalainen underwent male-to-female gender reassignment surgery in 2009, years after she married her partner.

But Finnish law does not recognise same-sex marriages.

State authorities said that for Hamalainen to have her new gender recognised, she would need to turn the marriage into a civil partnership or get a divorce - something the couple refused.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "European Court Of Human Rights Deals Blow To Trans Rights And Marriage Equality" by J. Lester Feder, BuzzFeed Staff 7/17/14

. . . After losing challenges in Finnish courts, they took the fight to the European Court of Human Rights, which has jurisdiction over the 47 states that have agreed to the European Convention on Human Rights including countries outside the European Union like Turkey and Russia.

. . . The ruling is not only a blow to the couple, but could have important implications for trans rights and marriage equality movements across Europe. The Italian Constitutional Court ducked a chance to rule in favor of marriage equality last month in a similar case, instead ordering parliament to create “a different form of registered partnership” that is “not the same as marriage” that would also allow trans people to keep legal protections for their unions after undergoing gender reassignment.

. . . The ruling also signals that the court is unlikely to revisit previous rulings that same-sex couples have no right to marry under European human rights law.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "Court: ‘No Obligation’ Under European Convention to Allow Same-Sex Marriage" posted at CNSNews.com 7/21/14

The European Convention on Human Rights “enshrines the traditional concept of marriage as between a man and a woman,” and there is ”no obligation on Contracting States to grant same-sex couples access to marriage,” the European Court of Human Rights ruled last Wednesday.

Article 12 of the European Convention, which governs the Council of Europe, states that “men and women of marriageable age have the right to marry and to found a family, according to the national laws governing the exercise of this right.”

“While it is true that some Contracting States have extended marriage to same-sex partners, Article 12 cannot be construed as imposing an obligation on the Contracting States to grant access to marriage to same-sex couples,” noted the majority opinion in Hämäläinen v. Finland.

The Court ruled that since a registered partnership “was a genuine option which provided legal protection for same-sex couples that was almost identical to that of marriage,” Hämäläinen’s rights had not been violated.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

Also read Parents in Germany Allow Babies to Choose Gender From Birth

Monday, July 21, 2014

HIV Rates Rise Among Homosexual Men: Federal Study

A U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report just released shows that HIV infection rates among young homosexual and bisexual men have doubled despite significant decreases in infection rates among all other segments of the population for more than a decade.  Meanwhile, HIV/AIDS researchers are reporting a worldwide increase in drug-resistant forms of the HIV virus.
"Among men who have sex with men, unprotected risk behaviors in the presence of high prevalence and unsuppressed viral load may continue to drive HIV transmission. Disparities in rates of HIV among young men who have sex with men present prevention challenges and warrant expanded efforts."
-- Anna Satcher Johnson, MPH, et. al., Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

"You will have patients with resistant form, they will transmit the virus to others, and long term if this is happening in several countries in the world, we may have a re-emergence of HIV appearing with a form of virus that is resistant to the current panel of antiretroviral drugs that we have."
-- Françoise Barré-Sinoussi, Nobel prize winning HIV/AIDS researcher
For background, read CDC Reports HIV Infections Rampant Among Homosexuals and also read Most HIV Homosexual Men Have Unprotected Sex, Says CDC Report as well as President Obama Commits $15 Million to Show that Gay Men Aren't the Cause of HIV/AIDS

THE KEY PROVEN FACT: Anal Sex is the Main Cause of the Spread of HIV/AIDS

-- From "HIV diagnoses rise among young gay men as total US cases drop" by Nicole Ostrow, Bloomberg News 7/19/14

While the number of people diagnosed with HIV in the U.S. dropped 33 percent in the last decade, new cases among young homosexual and bisexual men doubled, according to researchers who said prevention programs need to be expanded.

Better screening and prevention has driven the decline among women and people ages 35 to 44 years, a study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found. The two-fold increase was seen among young bisexual and homosexual men age 13 to 24 years, according to the study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

The findings, being released Saturday to coincide with the International AIDS Conference in Melbourne, Australia, are the first to use data from all 50 U.S. states to examine long-term trends in diagnosis, said study author Amy Lansky. Though strides are being made to cut HIV, prevention and screening efforts aren't adequately reaching a younger group, she said.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "HIV diagnosis rate in U.S. declines significantly" posted at CBS News 7/21/14

The reasons for the drop aren't clear. . . .

HIV is the virus that causes AIDS, which destroys the immune system. The World Health Organization estimates 35 million people globally have the virus. In the United States, 1.1 million people are thought to be infected, though many don't know it.

The study is based on HIV diagnoses from all 50 states' health departments, which get test results from doctors' office, clinics, hospitals and laboratories. The data span a decade, making this a larger and longer look at these trends than any previous study, said another study author, Amy Lansky of the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Declines were seen in the rates for men, women, whites, blacks, Hispanics, heterosexuals, injection drug users and most age groups. The only group in which diagnoses increased was gay and bisexual men, the study found.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "Only 1 in 5 sexually active U.S. teens HIV-tested" by Hoai-Tran Bui, USA TODAY 7/18/14


Young people account for the largest portion of new HIV infections, but only 22% of sexually active high school students have ever been tested for HIV, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports.

Those between 13 and 24 accounted for about 26% of all new HIV infections in 2010, and almost 60% of youths with HIV in the U.S. don't know they are infected. The new analysis, in the biennial National Youth Risk Behavior Survey, looks at high school students from 1991 to 2013, but found that the number of students getting tested has remained stagnant since 2005. In this age group, female and black students were more likely to be tested for HIV.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "Many Sexually Active U.S. Teens Not Tested for HIV: CDC" by Steven Reinberg, HealthDay News Reporter 7/18/14

The CDC report, which looked at data from 1991 to 2013, . . . is based on data from the CDC's National Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is a nationally representative survey done every two years among public and private school students in grades 9 to 12.
The proportion of teens who have had sexual intercourse dropped from 54 percent in 1991 to 46 percent in 2001, and remained stable at 47 percent in 2013.

Since 1991, sexual intercourse among black teens declined from 82 percent to 61 percent, among Hispanic teens from 53 percent to 49 percent, and among white teens from 50 percent to 44 percent in 2013.

The proportion of teens who had sexual intercourse with four or more partners dropped from 19 percent in 1991 to 14 percent in 2003, and has been stable since, at 15 percent.

The proportion of sexually active teens using condoms increased from 46 percent in 1991 to 63 percent in 2003, but dropped to 59 percent in 2013.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "Annual rate of HIV diagnoses drops over 30 percent between 2002 and 2011 in US" posted at Wall Street Journal 7/21/14

. . . While the rate fell significantly for most groups, it witnessed a significant rise among gay and transgender community, particularly among men between the age group 13 and 24.

The rate of diagnoses rose in men who had sex with other men over the 10-year period, the researchers said.

In 2003, the rate per 100,000 increased from 12.5 percent among young people to 17.3 percent in 2011. This was an increase of 38.4 percent.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "Aids deaths tumble but rising resistance to HIV drugs threatens gains" by Kat Austen, UK Guardian 7/18/14

In the runup to next week's international Aids conference in Melbourne, Australia, the UN has claimed that Aids-related deaths and new HIV infections have fallen by more than a third in a decade, raising hopes that the disease could be wiped out by 2030.

The optimism, however, is tempered by two facts: not only are more than half of the 35 million people living with HIV unaware they are infected, but the number of people with drug-resistant HIV, though relatively low, is increasing.

Deenan Pillay, director of the Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies in South Africa, says about 30-40% of his patients have experienced the virus replicating in their bodies after a year of treatment.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

In addition, read Pandemic Sex Diseases: Permanent Cure Dismissed and also read Fictional 'Safe Sex' - Government Losing War on STDs as well as HIV Cure: False Hope to Victims, Money to Others

And read New Aggressive HIV Strain Spreading AIDS Worldwide

Sunday, July 20, 2014

Judge Says Incest OK; It's the New Gay

As judges force same-sex "marriage" down the throats of Americans, it comes as no surprise for a judge to say that society needs to accept men having sex with their sisters, or for that matter, men having sex with children.
He also said the “only reason” that incest is still a crime is because of the high risk of genetic abnormalities in children born from consanguineous relationships “but even that falls away to an extent [because] there is such ease of contraception and readily access to abortion.”
For background, click headlines below to read previous articles:

Supreme Court's New Morality Means Justice for Polygamy

U.S. District Court Judge OKs Polygamy

'Civil Union' Joins a Man & Two Women in Brazil

Pedophiles Win in 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Pedophilia is Sexual Orientation, Like 'Being Gay'

Normalization of Pedophilia Urged by Psychiatrists

Democrat Senate Legalizes Bestiality in Military

Arizona School OKs Teacher: Pedophilia, Bestiality

Gay Pedophile Teacher Defended by Michigan School

-- From "Judge compares incest and paedophilia to past attitudes towards homosexuality, claiming they might not be taboo anymore" by Louise Hall, Court Reporter, Sydney Morning Herald 7/9/14

A Sydney judge has compared incest and paedophilia to homosexuality, saying the community may no longer see sexual contact between siblings and between adults and children as “unnatural” or “taboo”.

District Court Judge Garry Neilson said just as gay sex was socially unacceptable and criminal in the 1950s and 1960s but is now widely accepted, “a jury might find nothing untoward in the advance of a brother towards his sister once she had sexually matured, had sexual relationships with other men and was now ‘available’, not having [a] sexual partner”.

“If this was the 50s and you had a jury of 12 men there, which is what you’d invariably have, they would say it’s unnatural for a man to be interested in another man or a man being interested in a boy. Those things have gone.”

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "Is incest gaining acceptance? An Australian judge says it is" by Estelle Vosloo, Australian Times 7/14/14

Reported on Friday, Judge Neilson’s comment on incest becoming socially acceptable is being investigated.

Attorney-general for NSW, Brad Hazzard has said that judge Nielson’s comments are appalling and caused extreme concern.

“Incest is completely reprehensible, unacceptable, disgusting and criminal.”

Hazard has reported judge Neilson’s comments to the Judicial Commission of New South Wales for investigation. He also requested the District Court suspend the judge from criminal trials until the investigation into Neilson was completed.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo" by Jonathan Pearlman in Sydney, UK Telegraph 7/10/14

Judge Neilson made the comments during the trial of a brother charged with raping his younger sister. The man has pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting his sister when she was 10 or 11 years old in 1973 or 1974 but has pleaded not guilty to charges relating to sex they had in 1981, when she was 18 and he was 26.

"By that stage they are both mature adults," the judge said.

"The complainant has been sexually awoken, shall we say, by having two relationships with men and she had become 'free' when the second relationship broke down. The only thing that might change that is the fact that they were a brother and sister but we've come a long way from the 1950s – when the position of the English Common Law was that sex outside marriage was not lawful."

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

Also read Homosexual Predator, Honored by Obama, Arrested

Saturday, July 19, 2014

Supreme Court Blocks 'Gay Marriages' OKd by Obama

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that more than 1,000 same-sex "marriages" that occurred during a weeks-long chaotic period last year caused by a single activist judge are NOT required to be recognized by the State of Utah until its appeal is heard, even though the Obama administration's DOJ rushed to recognize the "marriages" immediately.
“Constitutional rights do not spring into existence by mass social activity triggered by the unreviewed decision of a single district court judge.”
-- State of Utah, in court brief
For background, read how President Obama's Department of Justice rushed to recognize same-sex "marriages" in Utah just days after the U.S. Supreme Court put a halt to the illegal marriage chaos.

Also read Lawless Obama Administration Tells States to Violate Oath for 'Gay Marriage'

For the "big picture," read how activist judges across America are forbidding voters the right to define marriage as between one man and one woman.  However, there's a lone appellate judge who says that there is NO constitutional protection for "gay marriage."

In addition, read President Obama Favors the One Percenters (Homosexuals)

-- From "Supreme Court Delays Benefits for Utah Gay Couples" by Brady McCombs, Associated Press 7/18/14

The couples were wed during a 17-day stretch in December when same-sex marriages were legal before the nation's highest court put the practice on hold. They had been set to get benefits Monday.

Utah Gov. Gary Herbert applauded the Supreme Court's decision. "I believe states have the right to determine their laws regarding marriage and, as I have said all along, that decision will ultimately come from the United States Supreme Court," he said in a statement.

The Supreme Court's order doesn't apply to any other states, but it could foretell how the high court would deal with similar situations elsewhere, said Douglas NeJaime, a University of California-Irvine law professor. Hundreds of other gay couples also married in Michigan, Wisconsin and Indiana after state bans were struck down and before those rulings were put on hold.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "Supreme Court Blocks Recognition of Utah Same-Sex Marriages" by Brent Kendall, Wall Street Journal 7/18/14

The high court, granting an emergency request by Utah Republican Gov. Gary Herbert, issued a brief order postponing the effect of a lower-court ruling that said the state had to recognize the same-sex marriages immediately.

Utah is in the process of preparing a petition to the Supreme Court that asks the justices to decide whether the state can continue to prohibit gay marriages. But questions surrounding existing Utah gay unions raise somewhat distinct legal issues.

Utah said that requiring the state to recognize the marriages now would be an unfair end run around the normal legal process, which is still going on.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "Justices Say Utah Doesn't Have to Recognize Gay Marriages" by Adam Liptak, New York Times 7/18/14

The marriages took place between Dec. 20, when Judge Robert J. Shelby of Federal District Court in Salt Lake City struck down Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage, and Jan. 6, when the Supreme Court issued a stay blocking that ruling while the decision was appealed.

On June 25, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, in Denver, upheld Judge Shelby’s ruling. Utah officials have announced that they will soon ask the Supreme Court to hear that case, which presents the separate and much larger question of whether there is a constitutional right to same-sex marriage.

Friday’s order came in a different case, one concerning the status of what the state calls “interim marriages,” meaning those entered into during that period in December and January when same-sex marriage was briefly allowed.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "U.S. Supreme Court grants Utah a stay in same-sex marriage case" by Maya Srikrishnan, Los Angeles Times 7/18/14

Utah wanted to ensure that it did not have to recognize the marriages performed while its ban was inoperative. Last week, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals denied Utah's request for a stay on that issue, giving it until July 21 to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Utah contended that would "create chaos" and "deprive public officials (and the governments they represent) of their own due-process rights to effective appellate review."

In its appeal to Sotomayor, Utah said, “Here, every single interim marriage performed as a result of the district court’s ... injunction directly challenges the sovereignty of Utah and its people. Each such marriage undermines the state’s sovereign interest in controlling ‘the marriage status of persons domiciled within its border.'"

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "Supreme Court grants stay in Utah marriage recognition case" by Jessica Miller, The Salt Lake Tribune 7/18/14

Utah asked [the Supreme Court] for the emergency order on Wednesday, saying that the state believes it will ultimately prevail in its fight to revive a ban on same-sex unions. If it loses, the state said it would work to nullify the marriages entered into during that window.

Utah continues to defend its right to define marriage as a union between one man and one woman on two fronts — in Evans. v. Utah and in the Kitchen v. Herbert case that in December toppled the state’s ban on same-sex unions.

Kimball ruled in May in the Evans case that Utah must recognize and imbue all same-sex marriages performed in the state with the same rights and privileges afforded to married opposite-sex couples. His decision did not go into effect immediately to give the state time to appeal.

Utah’s emergency application was filed with U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who oversees the federal court circuit of which Utah is a part and who, in January, halted the issuance of marriage licenses to same-sex couples in Utah after 17 days of marriages.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

Also read 'Gay Marriage' Not Favored in Polls, Only in Court

And read American Decline: Obama's Gay Agenda vs. Christians

Friday, July 18, 2014

Univ. Chicago Teaches Students How to Get Abortion

The University of Chicago, the only college in America performing on-campus abortions, publishes an abortion guide complete with clinic locations, financial aid, and warnings about lies told at pro-life centers, while advising that abortion is one of the "safest" medical procedures.

However, according to the University, the "procedure" is terminal for about a dozen students' infants per year.

For background, read
Gallup Poll Shows 'Higher Education' Indoctrinates Pro-abortion

And read about violent attacks by college professors on pro-lifers.

In addition, read how Planned Parenthood paid $2 million to hide the wrongful deaths of Chicagoan Tonya Reaves and her unborn child.

-- From "University Publishes How-To Guide On Getting Abortions" by Matt Lamb, The College Fix 7/3/14

Its launch has come under fire by some Illinois pro-life groups. A campus official told The College Fix that while the guide is hosted by the university, it’s not meant for students. Titled “Accessing Abortion in Illinois,” the guide launched on June 6 as a project of the Section of Family Planning and Contraceptive Research, the Center for Interdisciplinary Inquiry and Innovation in Sexual and Reproductive Health (Ci3), and the Urban Initiative of the National Institute for Reproductive Health.

While the university says it’s a guide for health and social service providers, the information is just as informative for students, providing links to multiple abortion providers in Illinois.

The guide says crisis pregnancy centers can cause “confusion” just by existing, and that going to such a place “can lead to delays in care for an individual who wants to consider abortion.” It cites a 2006 study commissioned by Rep. Henry Waxman, Democrat of California – at the time ranking member on the House Oversight Committee – that said such centers provide “false and misleading health information” about abortion.

Asked what other resources the university makes available to pregnant students, such as adoption services, the university forwarded links to how a student could acquire birth control or emergency contraception.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "University of Chicago Publishes How-To Guide on Obtaining an Abortion" by Melissa Duggan, Christian News Network 7/17/14

“The misrepresentation of facts continues in the abortion guide when it calls abortion ‘one of the safest and most common medical procedures…with less than a 2% risk of complications,’” Emily Zender, the executive director of Illinois Right to Life told Christian News Network. “However, it fails to note that in a Chicago Tribune investigation in 2011, ‘nearly 4,000 reports of abortion complications involving Illinois residents in 2009 were missing the required description.’”

“The abortion guide states, ‘equal access to all pregnancy options is critical for individuals,’ but then condemns the 31 pregnancy resource centers across Illinois,” Zender lamented. “These centers provide free pregnancy resources including free ultrasounds, free pregnancy tests, free counseling, free maternity clothing and much more. Why would a guide that underscores the importance of access to all pregnancy resources, attack community-based non-profits that increase pregnancy options and healthcare access?”

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

From "University under fire for so-called 'abortion guide'" by Sarah Manhardt, The Chicago Maroon (University of Chicago student newspaper) 7/15/14

. . . Rising third-year Cait Duggan, co-president of the RSO Students for Life, agreed that students would use the guide.

“We’re not sure how many students do seek abortions, but we believe that there is a population that do, so we think there will be students turning to this website,” she said. “By having this website [the University] is going to be able to facilitate abortions but it doesn’t seem like they’re going to be interested in helping students who want to keep their children.”

In a Maroon article from January 2013 (“After Roe, UCMC Gives Choice,” 1/25/13), [assistant professor of obstetrics/gynecology at the University of Chicago Medicine, Amy] Whitaker estimated that the Ryan Center Clinic performs approximately one abortion procedure for a student a month. An abortion procedure at the Ryan Center Clinic costs between $350–$1,500, depending on the stage of the pregnancy, and U-SHIP, as well as many other health insurance plans, covers abortion.

To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.

Also read ObamaNation: Rating Colleges Based on Immorality

And read Sadomasochistic Exhibit Funded by University of Chicago